U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Rights Division
Housing and Civil Enforcement Section
The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., prohibits discrimination
by direct providers of housing, such as landlords and real estate
companies as well as other entities, such as municipalities, banks
or other lending institutions and homeowners insurance companies
whose discriminatory practices make housing unavailable to persons
because of:
race or color
religion
sex
national origin
familial status, or
disability.
In cases involving discrimination in mortgage loans or home improvement
loans, the Department may file suit under both the Fair Housing Act
and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Under the Fair Housing Act, the Department of Justice may bring
lawsuits where there is reason to believe that a person or entity
is engaged in a "pattern or practice" of discrimination
or where a denial of rights to a group of persons raises an issue
of general public importance.
Where force or threat of force is used to deny or interfere with
fair housing rights, the Department of Justice may institute criminal
proceedings.
The Fair Housing Act also provides procedures for handling individual
complaints of discrimination. Individuals who believe that they have
been victims of an illegal housing practice, may file a complaint
with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or file
their own lawsuit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice
brings suits on behalf of individuals based on referrals from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
One of the central objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress
enacted it in 1968, was to prohibit race discrimination in sales
and rentals of housing. Nevertheless, more than 30 years later,
race discrimination in housing continues to be a problem. The majority
of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases involve claims
of race discrimination.
Sometimes, housing providers try to disguise their discrimination
by giving false information about availability of housing, either
saying that nothing was available or steering homeseekers to certain
areas based on race. Individuals who receive such false information
or misdirection may have no knowledge that they have been victims
of discrimination. The Department of Justice has brought many cases
alleging this kind of discrimination based on race or color. In addition,
the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program seeks to uncover this
kind of hidden discrimination and hold those responsible accountable.
Most of the mortgage lending cases brought by the Department under
the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have alleged
discrimination based on race or color. Some of the Department's cases
have also alleged that municipalities and other local government
entities violated the Fair Housing Act when they denied permits or
zoning changes for housing developments, or relegated them to predominantly
minority neighborhoods, because the prospective residents were expected
to be predominantly African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing based upon
religion. This prohibition covers instances of overt discrimination
against members of a particular religion as well less direct actions,
such as zoning ordinances designed to limit the use of private homes
as a places of worship. The number of cases filed since 1968 alleging
religious discrimination is small in comparison to some of the other
prohibited bases, such as race or national origin.
The Act does contain a limited exception that allows non-commercial
housing operated by a religious organization to reserve such housing
to persons of the same religion.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Sexual Harassment
The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful to discriminate in housing
on the basis of sex. In recent years, the Department's focus in this
area has been to challenge sexual harassment in housing. Women, particularly
those who are poor, and with limited housing options, often have
little recourse but to tolerate the humiliation and degradation of
sexual harassment or risk having their families and themselves removed
from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is aimed at
landlords who create an untenable living environment by demanding
sexual favors from tenants or by creating a sexually hostile environment
for them. In this manner we seek both to obtain relief for tenants
who have been treated unfairly by a landlord because of sex and also
deter other potential abusers by making it clear that they cannot
continue their conduct without facing repercussions.
In addition, pricing discrimination in mortgage lending may also
adversely affect women, particularly minority women. This type of
discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal
Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination based upon national
origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the country
of an individual's birth or where his or her ancestors originated.
Census data indicate that the Hispanic population is the fastest
growing segment of our nation's population. The Justice Department
has taken enforcement action against municipal governments that have
tried to reduce or limit the number of Hispanic families that may
live in their communities. We have sued lenders under both the Fair
Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have imposed
more stringent underwriting standards on home loans or made loans
on less favorable terms for Hispanic borrowers. The Department has
also sued lenders for discrimination against Native Americans.
Other areas of the country have experienced an increasing diversity
of national origin groups within their populations. This includes
new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the former
Soviet Union, and other portions of Eastern Europe. We have taken
action against private landlords who have discriminated against such
individuals.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, prohibits discrimination
in housing against families with children under 18. In addition to
prohibiting an outright denial of housing to families with children,
the Act also prevents housing providers from imposing any special
requirements or conditions on tenants with custody of children. For
example, landlords may not locate families with children in any single
portion of a complex, place an unreasonable restriction on the total
number of persons who may reside in a dwelling, or limit their access
to recreational services provided to other tenants.
In most instances, the amended Fair Housing Act prohibits a housing
provider from refusing to rent or sell to families with children.
However, some facilities may be designated as Housing for Older Persons
(55 years of age). This type of housing, which meets the standards
set forth in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, may operate
as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) has published regulations and additional guidance
detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability
in all types of housing transactions. The Act defines persons with
a disability to mean those individuals with mental or physical impairments
that substantially limit one or more major life activities. The term
mental or physical impairment may include conditions such as blindness,
hearing impairment, mobility impairment, HIV infection, mental retardation,
alcoholism, drug addiction, chronic fatigue, learning disability,
head injury, and mental illness. The term major life activity may
include seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, performing manual tasks,
caring for one's self, learning, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing
Act also protects persons who have a record of such an impairment,
or are regarded as having such an impairment. Current users of illegal
controlled substances, persons convicted for illegal manufacture
or distribution of a controlled substance, sex offenders, and juvenile
offenders are not considered disabled under the Fair Housing Act,
by virtue of that status.
The Fair Housing Act affords no protections to individuals with
or without disabilities who present a direct threat to the persons
or property of others. Determining whether someone poses such a direct
threat must be made on an individualized basis, however, and cannot
be based on general assumptions or speculation about the nature of
a disability.
The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's protections
for persons with disabilities has concentrated on two major areas.
One is insuring that zoning and other regulations concerning land
use are not employed to hinder the residential choices of these individuals,
including unnecessarily restricting communal, or congregate, residential
arrangements, such as group homes. The second area is insuring that
newly constructed multifamily housing is built in accordance with
the Fair Housing Act's accessibility requirements so that it is accessible
to and usable by people with disabilities, and, in particular, those
who use wheelchairs.
There are other federal statutes that prohibit discrimination against
individuals with disabilities, including the Americans with Disabilities
Act, which is enforced by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil
Rights Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
Group Homes
Some individuals with disabilities may live together in congregate
living arrangements, often referred to as "group homes." The
Fair Housing Act prohibits municipalities and other local government
entities from making zoning or land use decisions or implementing
land use policies that exclude or otherwise discriminate against
individuals with disabilities.
The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful --
To utilize land use policies or actions that treat groups of persons
with disabilities less favorably than groups of non-disabled persons.
An example would be an ordinance prohibiting housing for persons
with disabilities or a specific type of disability, such as mental
illness, from locating in a particular area, while allowing other
groups of unrelated individuals to live together in that area.
To take action against, or deny a permit, for a home because of the
disability of individuals who live or would live there. An example
would be denying a building permit for a home because it was intended
to provide housing for persons with mental retardation.
To refuse to make reasonable accommodations in land use and zoning
policies and procedures where such accommodations may be necessary
to afford persons or groups of persons with disabilities an equal
opportunity to use and enjoy housing. What constitutes a reasonable
accommodation is a case-by-case determination. Not all requested
modifications of rules or policies are reasonable. If a requested
modification imposes an undue financial or administrative burden
on a local government, or if a modification creates a fundamental
alteration in a local government's land use and zoning scheme, it
is not a "reasonable" accommodation.
There has been a significant amount of litigation concerning the
ability of local governmental units to exercise control over group
living arrangements, particularly for persons with disabilities.
To provide guidance on these issues, the Departments of Justice and
Housing and Urban Development have issued a Joint Statement on Group
Homes, Local Land Use and the Fair Housing Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability -- Accessibility
Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act defines discrimination in housing against persons
with disabilities to include a failure "to design and construct" certain
new multi-family dwellings so that they are accessible to and usable
by persons with disabilities, and particularly people who use wheelchairs.
The Act requires all newly constructed multi-family dwellings of
four or more units intended for first occupancy after March 13, 1991,
to have certain features: an accessible entrance on an accessible
route, accessible common and public use areas, doors sufficiently
wide to accommodate wheelchairs, accessible routes into and through
each dwelling, light switches, electrical outlets, and thermostats
in accessible location, reinforcements in bathroom walls to accommodate
grab bar installations, and usable kitchens and bathrooms configured
so that a wheelchair can maneuver about the space.
Developers, builders, owners, and architects responsible for the
design or construction of new multi-family housing may be held liable
under the Fair Housing Act if their buildings fail to meet these
design requirements. The Department of Justice has brought many enforcement
actions against those who failed to do so. Most of the cases have
been resolved by consent decrees providing a variety of types of
relief, including: retrofitting to bring inaccessible features into
compliance where feasible and where it is not -- alternatives (monetary
funds or other construction requirements) that will provide for making
other housing units accessible; training on the accessibility requirements
for those involved in the construction process; a mandate that all
new housing projects comply with the accessibility requirements,
and monetary relief for those injured by the violations. In addition,
the Department has sought to promote accessibility through building
codes.
Page last updated 1/5/2000 |